Re: Tramp, "[]" in file names, and file-expand-wildcards

[Kai Großjohann]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> From: address@hidden (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
>> Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 10:22:03 +0200
>> 
>> I think it's okay to have this mechanism.  Each filename handler can
>> decide to invoke the remaining filename handlers, if so desired.
> 
> Aren't there situations where the order of the handlers' invocation is
> important?

Hm, yes, quite possibly.  So, should the filename handlers be
rewritten so that order does not matter?

The whole thing is a thorny subject, I guess.  I guess a high-level
design decision is necessary, first, before trying to hack the
individual packages to work around this.

kai
-- 
Linux provides a nice `poweroff' command, but where is `poweron'?