[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Should invisible imply intangible?

From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: Should invisible imply intangible?
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 16:41:41 -0700 (MST)

    >     Also, as David Kastrup has mentioned repeatedly, intangible text tends
    >     to break lots of things...
    > I don't think so.

    Please, Richard, try to remember the lengthy discussion we've had about 

You seem to agree with my conclusion:

    In practice, it's generally a non-issue because most uses of intangible
    text are restricted to a particular context so that this intangible
    text is only accessed by a small body of elisp code.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]