Re: Should invisible imply intangible?

[Richard Stallman]

    >     Also, as David Kastrup has mentioned repeatedly, intangible text tends
    >     to break lots of things...
    > 
    > I don't think so.

    Please, Richard, try to remember the lengthy discussion we've had about 
that.

You seem to agree with my conclusion:

    In practice, it's generally a non-issue because most uses of intangible
    text are restricted to a particular context so that this intangible
    text is only accessed by a small body of elisp code.