[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should invisible imply intangible?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Should invisible imply intangible? |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Mar 2002 14:58:07 -0700 (MST) |
I wrote
The change in adjust_point_for_property seems ok, and it might solve
this problem.
However, subsequently I realized it should be somewhat different. The
buffer position just after the invisible text should be treated as
part of the range where point cannot be. (This is how invisible,
intangible text is handled now.)
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/03
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/03
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/04
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/05
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/05
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/09
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/09
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/11
- Message not available
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/11
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/12
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/13
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, David Kastrup, 2002/03/13
- Re: Should invisible imply intangible?, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/14