[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality.
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality. |
Date: |
Tue, 07 May 2002 20:12:14 -0400 |
> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > > That may be true, but I'd like to see what the issue is more
> > concretely.
> > > If cua and viper tried to use one alist, what would they have to do
> > > to prevent it from being messed up? What does "messed up" mean in
> > this
> > > context?
> >
> > Changing the sequence or removing an element from the alist.
> >
> > I don't understand--could you be less cryptic?
> > That does not seem to answer either one of my questions.
> > It is not the right kind of answer for either one.
>
> You asked in what way the alist could be "messed up" in "this context".
>
> The "messing up" I'm concerned about is if some other mode
> (accidentally) changes the sequence of the elements in the alist, or
> (accidentally) removes one or more of the elements.
The issue of ordering seems academic since I still haven't heard
of any piece of code that accidentally changes the ordering of entries
on minor-mode-map-alist. Similarly I haven't heard of any case
where an entry is accidentally removed (this would simply be a bug).
I thought the only real problem was that you needed your maps to be
at the head of minor-mode-map-alist to take precedence over all others.
(this applies both to cua and viper).
This is a problem because minor modes (almost) always add themselves
at the head of the list.
Stefan
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Richard Stallman, 2002/05/01
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/01
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Richard Stallman, 2002/05/02
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/03
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Richard Stallman, 2002/05/03
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/04
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Richard Stallman, 2002/05/05
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/05
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Richard Stallman, 2002/05/07
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/07
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality.,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/08
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Stefan Monnier, 2002/05/08
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/08
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Stefan Monnier, 2002/05/08
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Miles Bader, 2002/05/08
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/09
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Richard Stallman, 2002/05/08
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/08
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Richard Stallman, 2002/05/09
- Re: Enhancements to "minor-mode-map-alist" functionality., Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/10