[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound..
From: |
Francesco Potorti` |
Subject: |
Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.. |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Sep 2002 14:55:16 +0200 |
RMS:
> Do people think we should remove the F2 bindings? We could provide
> commands on F2 and F3 that resemble simple text editors.
Kim:
I don't know what simple editors we need to look like, or whether any of
the simple editors resembles each other. I doubt it.
As an example, M$-Word (which I would image quite a few users are
using -- like it or not) has the following bindings
Word is not a simple editor, it is a very complex wysiwyg word
processor. I was referring to simple text editors, like those I used in
the old time of DOS systems on text consoles, and like many are still
around.
Doing a quick survey of the text editors available in Debian, I find
that some use Emacs-like bindings, some (the simplest ones) use only
single control-key commands, some use C-k prefixed commands. Of the
others (X is X, T is text console):
T fte: F1 help F2 save F3 open F9 compile F10 menu
T hexedit: F1 save F2 save F3 load F7 copy F8 paste F9 mark F10 menu
T jered: F1 comm F2 shell F3 quit F4 save F5 find F6 mark F10 remove
T le: F1 help F2 save F3 load F5/6 mark F9 compile F10 menu
T mped: F2 save F3 open F4 close F5 new
T ne: F1 menu F2 next F3 prev F4 select F5/6 undo/redo F10 help
T qe: F1 manu
T sted: F1 help F9 quit F11 load F12
save
T woody: F10 menu
T zed: F1 help F2 save F3 load F5 zoom F10 menu
T zile: F1 help F2 save F3 load F10 menu
X Kedit: F1 help F3 find next
X flimmer: F1 help F2 props F4 highlight
X gedit: F3 open F6 find F7 replace
X ghex: F3 open
X gnotepad: F3 open
X kate: F1 help F3 find next
X scite: F1 help F2 n.bkmk F3 find next
X the: F1 help F2 nextw F3 save
Apparently, then, traditional textual editors use F2 and F3 for save and
load quite consistently, while modern X-based editors use a different
convention, maybe there are Gnome and Kedit standards for this.
We already provide things like crisp-mode which binds a lot of keys in
ways which resembles other editors. That's a reasonable approach.
Yes.
But it shouldn't be the default to try to mimic other (inferior :-)
editors.
Don't know. Maybe we could provide a series of mappings for the
functions keys. If we find a mapping that can be thought to be
reasonably standard for simple text editors, we could use that as the
default, and make it possible to switch to other mappings.
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., (continued)
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Richard Stallman, 2002/09/01
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Miles Bader, 2002/09/01
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Richard Stallman, 2002/09/03
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Kim F. Storm, 2002/09/03
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Richard Stallman, 2002/09/04
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Kim F. Storm, 2002/09/08
Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Richard Stallman, 2002/09/01
Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound..,
Francesco Potorti` <=
Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Kim F. Storm, 2002/09/08
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Francesco Potorti`, 2002/09/09
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Miles Bader, 2002/09/09
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Richard Stallman, 2002/09/09
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Richard Stallman, 2002/09/09
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Kim F. Storm, 2002/09/10
Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Francesco Potorti`, 2002/09/10
Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Kim F. Storm, 2002/09/10