[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound..
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.. |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:34:47 -0400 |
The question would be very annoying. I think it should terminate and
define the macro. If the user wants to ignore that definition, he
can. If the user wants to add to it, he can do that too.
Someone suggested that the erring command should be omitted from the
macro. I agree, that is definitely desirable.
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., (continued)
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Richard Stallman, 2002/09/01
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Francesco Potorti`, 2002/09/06
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Kim F. Storm, 2002/09/08
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Francesco Potorti`, 2002/09/09
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Miles Bader, 2002/09/09
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Richard Stallman, 2002/09/09
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound..,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Kim F. Storm, 2002/09/10
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Francesco Potorti`, 2002/09/10
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Kim F. Storm, 2002/09/10
- Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.., Francesco Potorti`, 2002/09/11