Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes

[Eli Zaretskii]

On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Richard Stallman wrote:

>       In other words, running `diff' on 
>     the original and the edited files will not show any changes in those line 
>     you didn't modify.  However, unification means that `diff' _will_ 
>     sometimes show differences in unedited portions of the file, because C2 
>     was recoded into a different codepoint.
> 
> Given that we are using unicode and unification,
> isn't this inevitable?

Perhaps it is; but it's something that might surprise (to put it mildly) 
users.  We should probably document this in some prominent place, unless 
we are going to take care of it.