[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: file-relative-name and remote files
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: file-relative-name and remote files |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:43:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.3.50 |
address@hidden (Kai Großjohann) writes:
|> Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
|>
|> > IIRC there are systems where "/.." has a different meaning than "/".
|>
|> Really? Whee. Can Tramp be used to connect to them? If it can,
|> then maybe it shouldn't interpret such filenames.
|>
|> (Which systems are you talking about, btw?)
I can't remember, but I think it has a similar meaning as the "//" special
case on some other systems. Both "//" and "/.." are not required to be
the same as "/" according to POSIX.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, (continued)
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/25
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Kai Großjohann, 2003/02/27
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Kai Großjohann, 2003/02/27
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Andreas Schwab, 2003/02/27
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Kai Großjohann, 2003/02/28
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Miles Bader, 2003/02/28
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Stefan Monnier, 2003/02/28
- Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Andreas Schwab, 2003/02/28
Re: file-relative-name and remote files, Lars Hansen, 2003/02/27