[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rationale for split-string?
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Rationale for split-string? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 07:56:26 -0500 (CDT) |
I am not going to respond to the essence of your statement, since it
does not have any. (It is just emotional stuff, it has no rational
content.) I just want to point out that I am not an official
spokesperson for Emacs. I represent my own opinions, not those of
Emacs or "the Emacs developers". Any "Evil Intents" you seem to be
attributing to Emacs and the Emacs developers are strictly and
completely my own personal Evilness.
Sincerely,
Luc Teirlinck.
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, (continued)
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/20
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/20
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/21
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/21
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Miles Bader, 2003/04/21
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/21
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Jerry James, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Jerry James, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Jerry James, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/23
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/24