[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rationale for split-string?
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Rationale for split-string? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:27:47 -0500 (CDT) |
I interpreted your original message as suggesting that I was a
hypocrite (and that other people involved with Emacs were hypocrites)
because I was worrying about breaking existing code now, whereas
nobody connected with Emacs development worried about breaking
existing code four years ago. (The answer to that is that I did not
subscribe to Emacs devel four years ago and that I represent my own
opinions, not other people's opinions.)
I am willing to believe that you did not mean to suggest the above, in
which case I overreacted to your message. Sorry.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, (continued)
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/21
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/21
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Miles Bader, 2003/04/21
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/21
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Jerry James, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Jerry James, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Jerry James, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/23
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/24