[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 11:09:20 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 10:15:05AM -0400, David Abrahams wrote:
> > Um, it might help if you actually said what operation is slower....
> Almost anything.  `M-g' to get new message headers is one example, but
> downloading a large message (with, say, a several-megabyte
> attachment), shows a really remarkable difference in speed.

Almost anything, like C-f, C-n, and M-x hanoi?

At least in this message you gave an example -- M-g (I assume in a gnus
summary buffer) -- but even that is very vague.  Is it only with imap (as you
previously implied)?  Does it happen with local (file) mailboxes too?  Pop3?

If you want to report a bug, please give specific examples, with lots of
details!  What may be obvious to you isn't necessarily obvious to the rest of
us; see the info node `(emacs)Bugs'.

I have seen the enemy, and he is us.  -- Pogo

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]