[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs
From: |
David Abrahams |
Subject: |
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:15:05 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090018 (Oort Gnus v0.18) XEmacs/21.4 (Native Windows TTY Support (Windows), cygwin32) |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 07:43:59AM -0400, David Abrahams wrote:
>> Now that I've got your attention, I should qualify that. On Windows
>> XP using GNUs and talking to an IMAP server, it's way faster to use
>> XEmacs than to use Gnu Emacs. Nobody over on the GNUs list has a clue
>> as to why, but since they just work on elisp code they surmise it's
>> something in the emacs implementation.
>
> Um, it might help if you actually said what operation is slower....
Almost anything. `M-g' to get new message headers is one example, but
downloading a large message (with, say, a several-megabyte
attachment), shows a really remarkable difference in speed.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
- Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs,
David Abrahams <=
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Miles Bader, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/24
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/24