[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8 |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Apr 2003 14:14:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
> In article <address@hidden>, Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
>> It would be nice if there were some more information how to set the
>> suggested fontset. Reading the manual I get the impression that
>> 'emacs -fn mule-unicode-...' should work, but it doesn't.
>
> From which part of manual, did you get that impression?
"Fontsets" together with "Font X". But I now realize I didn't read it
carefully.
>> I also tried setting the emacs.font X resource, but same
>> problem. Starting emacs says:
>
>> No fonts match
>> `mule-unicode-2500-33ff:-gnu-unifont-*-iso10646-1,mule-unicode-e000-ffff:-gnu-unifont-*-iso10646-1,mule-unicode-0100-24ff:-gnu-unifont-*-iso10646-1'
>
> It doesn't work. Please follow what described in the
> "Difining Fontsets" node of Emacs info.
It seems to work, thanks. Wouldn't it be useful to at least be able
to customize the fontset? Requiring use of X resources to get Unicode
to show up correctly is not user friendly. I guess these problems
goes away when Emacs stops chosing fonts with empty characters, so
perhaps users simply will have to wait for 22.
Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/25
Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/26
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8,
Simon Josefsson <=