[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8 |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Apr 2003 09:44:54 -0400 |
It seems binary is preferred over utf-8 and utf-16-* in
coding-category-list. This seems extremely conservative. I guess it
means UTF-8 can never be autodetected by default?
That certainly seems undesirable. Unless there is a specific reason
why it needs to be this way, I agree with you that we should raise
the priority of utf-8 and utf-16.
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, (continued)
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/25
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/25
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/25
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/26
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/26
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/28
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/28
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2003/04/26
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2003/04/26
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/28
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/26
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/28
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/28
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Stefan Monnier, 2003/04/29
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/29
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/30
- Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/30
Re: Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/25