[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8

From: Simon Josefsson
Subject: Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 23:16:23 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)

address@hidden (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
>> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Mentioning this in PROBLEMS seems like a good idea to me, but a useful
>>> entry needs to be stated in terms of what behavior the user sees.
>>> This text doesn't explain the practical consequences; a user would say
>>> "so what does that mean for me?"
>> Is this better?
> Can you say what characters you're talking about, instead of just the
> code points?  I guess that most people haven't memorized the Unicode
> table (your truly included ;-).

I agree, but I don't know which they are, and maybe the range includes
very many different kind of characters.  And as new characters are
added all the time, I fear that both the list of supported characters
and the list of unsupported characters would be too long to be useful.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]