[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8 |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 00:37:22 -0400 |
+* Encoding some characters as Unicode is rejected by Emacs.
+
+Emacs currently only supports the parts of the BMP whose codepoints
+are in the ranges 0000-33ff and e000-ffff. If you try to save a file
+containing characters with code points outside this range, Emacs will
+suggest other compatible coding systems.
That is clearer; it's written in terms of behavior the user sees.
I agree with the people who said that the codepoint numbers may not
be clear enough.
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, (continued)
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/29
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Simon Josefsson, 2003/04/29
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/28
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2003/04/29
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/30
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/30
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/28
- Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: More Cyrillic vs UTF-8, Kenichi Handa, 2003/04/26