[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs? |
Date: |
03 Jun 2003 22:28:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Kevin Rodgers <address@hidden> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>
> > Kevin Rodgers <address@hidden> writes:
> >>That seems to require the following patch; is this a known bug in `kbd'?
> ...
> > Well, what about "KEYS should be a string constant" don't you
> > understand?
>
>
> All of it, apparently. :-)
>
> > It is documented right there in the piece you have quoted
> > in the patch, and it is probably this way for efficiency reasons.
>
> I can't see any significant efficiency savings in restricting such a simple
> macro's sole argument to a constant.
You can't evaluate it at compile time if it isn't a constant. The
macro is there to provide a more readable (and portable) way to encode
fixed key sequences.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?, (continued)
Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/01
Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/02
Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/06/02
Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/06/02
Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?, Andreas Schwab, 2003/06/04
Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/06/05