[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Idea for compilation mode
From: |
Stephan Stahl |
Subject: |
Re: Idea for compilation mode |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:27:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> These two issues are unrelated. If you suggest specific bindings,
> I can think about them.
I was thinking of C-c r for recompile, C-c c for compile and C-c g or C-c s for
compilation-mode-grep.
> I've always use the old gosmacs binding for this -- `C-x C-n' -- which I
> find very nice (even on a normal ascii keyboard, C-x ` is rather awkward
> to type).
>
> I didn't put it there because I carried forward the original Emacs
> meaning of C-x C-n. However, it could well be that next-error is
> used more than set-goal-column. So perhaps that binding should be changed.
>
> However, if next-error is C-x C-n, previous-error can't be C-x C-p.
> It would be better to find a good pair of keys for next-error and
> previous-error.
I am not sure how often C-x C-p (mark-page) is used but maybe it could be moved
to C-x p which is free at the moment and would be similar to C-x h (mark-whole-
buffer).
Then C-x C-p and C-x C-n could be used for next previous error if
set-goal-column is not so important to be on C-x C-n. But as someone pointed
out a negative argument to next-error goes backward so maybe C-x C-n can be
left untouched.
--
Stephan Stahl
- Re: Idea for compilation mode, (continued)
Re: Idea for compilation mode, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/04
- Re: Idea for compilation mode, Miles Bader, 2003/06/04
- Re: Idea for compilation mode,
Stephan Stahl <=
- Re: Idea for compilation mode, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/05
- Re: Idea for compilation mode, Lute Kamstra, 2003/06/05
- Re: Idea for compilation mode, Miles Bader, 2003/06/05
- Re: Idea for compilation mode, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/05
Re: Idea for compilation mode, Kai Großjohann, 2003/06/07
Re: Idea for compilation mode, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/05