[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: narrow-to-here-document
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: narrow-to-here-document |
Date: |
26 Jun 2003 16:19:57 +0900 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> This suggests we should use some other more general term instead.
> How about "literal"? Any other suggestions?
>
> (defun make-indirect-buffer-for-hdoc (&optional change-major-mode)...
>
> I suggest the name edit-literal for that function.
> We should not rigidly put all relevant entities into the function name.
I find the name `literal' not clear for the opposite reason -- it seems
too broad, and literal seems like a work that might have many other
potential meanings. Since the crucial point is that it's a literal field
embedded in a buffer, how about something like `edit-embedded-literal' or
`edit-literal-field'?
-Miles
--
`To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to,
all of life's problems' --Homer J. Simpson
- Re: narrow-to-here-document, (continued)
- Re: narrow-to-here-document, Stefan Daschek, 2003/06/25
- mmm-mode.el(Re: narrow-to-here-document), Masatake YAMATO, 2003/06/26
- Re: narrow-to-here-document, David Kastrup, 2003/06/26
- Re: narrow-to-here-document, Alan Shutko, 2003/06/29
- Re: narrow-to-here-document, Miles Bader, 2003/06/29
- Re: narrow-to-here-document, Kai Großjohann, 2003/06/30
- Re: narrow-to-here-document, David Kastrup, 2003/06/30
- Re: narrow-to-here-document, Kai Großjohann, 2003/06/30
- Re: narrow-to-here-document, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/06/25
Message not available
Re: narrow-to-here-document, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/26