[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [mew-int 01585] Re: windows 1252

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: [mew-int 01585] Re: windows 1252
Date: 04 Nov 2003 07:55:07 +0200

> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:13:34 +0900 (JST)
> From: Kazu Yamamoto (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCOzNLXE9CSScbKEI=?=) <address@hidden>
> (2) Co-exist of Emacs and XEmacs.
>       The 'emacs-mule coding-system is not appropriate since XEmacs
>       has a different internal representation from Emacs'one. Note
>       Emacsen use different 'emacs-mule coding-system among
>       versions.
> The one-and-only coding-system which, I found, meets the requirements
> above is 'ctext.

In that case, extending ctext to handle the problem we were discussing
in this thread would not be a good idea: IIRC, XEmacs doesn't support
extended segments, and non-MULE Emacsen certainly don't.  Or am I
missing something?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]