Re: Documentation for "Clone Buffers" (corrected version)

[Miles Bader]

Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> writes:
> >The recommended method is to create one, do M-x rename-uniquely, then
> >switch to some other buffer and do M-x info again.  This works for all
> >sorts of special facilities.
>
> I'm rather surprised at the preference for leaving an Emacs command like
> `clone-buffers' _undocumented_.  Does this perhaps signal an intention to
> remove this command from Emacs?  If so, why?

I missed the start of this thread, but what's _wrong_ with documenting
clone-buffer for this case?  It's more convenient than rename-uniquely,
works great, and even already has a convenient keybinding in Info-mode.

-Miles
-- 
`The suburb is an obsolete and contradictory form of human settlement'