[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Documentation for "Clone Buffers" (corrected version)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Documentation for "Clone Buffers" (corrected version) |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:09:25 -0500 |
Maybe another generic solution would be a prefix arg which causes
a subsequent `get-buffer-create' (or somesuch) to not find the buffer it's
looking for. I.e. after M-x magic-prefix RET calling (get-buffer-create
"*shell*") would look for *shell* and if it exists, it would rename it
uniquely, and then create a new *shell*.
Command interfaces of this sort tend to be fragile. You do some work
to enter the prefix that will modify the real command. Then if you
find you need to do something else before typing the real command,
or you make a mistake typing the real command, the work of the prefix
has to be redone.
For instance, I find the C-x RET c is troublesome in this way.
It would be good to think of a less fragile interface for this.
- Re: Documentation for "Clone Buffers" (corrected version), (continued)
- Re: Documentation for "Clone Buffers" (corrected version), Miles Bader, 2004/03/12
- Re: Documentation for "Clone Buffers" (corrected version), Luc Teirlinck, 2004/03/12
- Re: Documentation for "Clone Buffers" (corrected version), Juri Linkov, 2004/03/15
- Re: Documentation for "Clone Buffers" (corrected version), Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/15
- Re: Documentation for "Clone Buffers" (corrected version), Miles Bader, 2004/03/15
- Re: Documentation for "Clone Buffers" (corrected version), David Kastrup, 2004/03/15
- Re: Documentation for "Clone Buffers" (corrected version), Juri Linkov, 2004/03/16
Re: Documentation for "Clone Buffers" (corrected version), Alex Schroeder, 2004/03/11
Re: Documentation for "Clone Buffers" (corrected version), Miles Bader, 2004/03/11
Re: Documentation for "Clone Buffers" (corrected version), Richard Stallman, 2004/03/11