Re: Emphasize the character to be typed next in *Completions*

[Kim F. Storm]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     To emphasize the non-informative part is not useful, but a different
>     face could be used to *de-emphasize* it.  (Even if emphasizing the
>     word "de-emphasize" looks paradoxical, it's appropriate here :-)
> 
> That is true.  So perhaps what it should do is put one face on that part
> and another face on the rest.
> 
> This way, there is no option to customize, but there are two faces
> to customize.

That's definitely a better approach.  Setting either face variable to nil
should mean "don't decorate this part".

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk