[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
ams |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:39:33 +0100 |
Since this is getting to a vote, I'll pitch in with my 0.02 groszy.
Never used goto-line (don't see why one would use it other then in
really obscure situations), use M-g far more often that that.
But on another side, the idea by Kim Storm (I think) of adding a set
of bindings for recompile, compile, and next-error wasn't a bad one.
Those are things I always wondered why they aren't bound by default.
Cheers.
- Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Jari Aalto+mail.emacs, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, John Wiegley, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Eric Hanchrow, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line,
ams <=
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/26