[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
25 Mar 2004 16:54:29 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> But on another side, the idea by Kim Storm (I think) of adding a set
> of bindings for recompile, compile, and next-error wasn't a bad one.
> Those are things I always wondered why they aren't bound by default.
For what it's worth I always thought C-c C-c was the natural binding for
`compile' (or more generally for "here, I'm done editing, now process what
I've edited").
Stefan
- Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Jari Aalto+mail.emacs, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, John Wiegley, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Eric Hanchrow, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, ams, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/03/26