[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lisp/url/url-https.el
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: lisp/url/url-https.el |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Apr 2004 23:52:16 -0400 |
Are url-https.el and ssl.el really specifically designed to call
encryption routines? I thought they only run some external communication
program which happens to use encryption.
I am not sure whether this makes a difference. I had better get legal
advice about this. Could someone describe for me the overall
structure of the situation, so I can ask about it?
Much like Tramp.
I don't know this case and the Tramp case are similar in the way
that matters legally.
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, (continued)
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/04/17
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/19
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/04/19
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/19
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/04/19
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/19
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/04/20
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Michael Albinus, 2004/04/20
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/04/20
- Checkout a branch in cvs-tree, Masatake YAMATO, 2004/04/20
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, David Kastrup, 2004/04/11
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/11
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, David Kastrup, 2004/04/12
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Simon Josefsson, 2004/04/12
- Re: lisp/url/url-https.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/13