Re: simple patch for `etags.el'

[Paul Pogonyshev]

Kim F. Storm wrote:

> Paul Pogonyshev <address@hidden> writes:
> > Actually, my patch did just this:
> >
> >     (when (and (reached-next-percentage)
> >                (enough-time-has-passed))
>
> I was thinking about
>
>   (when (reached-next-percentage)
>     (setq next-percentage (1+ next-percentage))  ; or similar
>     (when (enougn-time-has-passed)
>       (message ...)))

Yes, this does make a difference.  This also complicates the
code quite a lot.  So, do we want time constraint as an
addition?

Paul