[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: simple patch for `etags.el'
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: simple patch for `etags.el' |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 05:30:14 -0400 |
Yes, this does make a difference. This also complicates the
code quite a lot. So, do we want time constraint as an
addition?
If something takes 30 seconds and the number changes 3 times a second,
it could look ugly. Does it look better with a minimum time such as 1
second or .5 second? It might be better to have that as a default
minimum time.
- Re: simple patch for `etags.el', (continued)
Re: simple patch for `etags.el', Richard Stallman, 2004/09/21
- Re: simple patch for `etags.el', Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/09/21
- Re: simple patch for `etags.el', Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/22
- Re: simple patch for `etags.el', Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/09/22
- Re: simple patch for `etags.el', Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/22
- Re: simple patch for `etags.el', David Kastrup, 2004/09/22
- Re: simple patch for `etags.el', Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/09/22
- Re: simple patch for `etags.el',
Richard Stallman <=