[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome? |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Oct 2004 18:03:41 -0500 (CDT) |
Richard Stallman wrote:
They may be trivial to implement, but if you're talking about the
ones that we discussed, they get rid of a useful feature.
Which feature? After my proposed change, .?.uu and .*.uu would still
do exactly the same thing they do now. My proposed change just
exploits the fact that .''?''.uu and .''*''.uu are currently useless
synonyms for the two simpler expressions. After my patch you can
cause expansion by surrounding ? or * on both sides by whitespace _or_
two single-quotes.
So:
mv ? .''?''.uu
prepends . and appends .uu to the names of all marked files.
This _adds_ a feature and gets rid of none. It does this without
making using wildcards less convenient, unlike the more difficult to
implement feature.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Juri Linkov, 2004/10/12
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/12
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, David Kastrup, 2004/10/13
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/13
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Johan Vromans, 2004/10/14
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Andreas Schwab, 2004/10/14
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Miles Bader, 2004/10/14
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Andreas Schwab, 2004/10/14
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/15