[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?
From: |
Johan Vromans |
Subject: |
Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:26:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Maybe I should mention a possible simpler solution, proposed in
> private email by Johan Vromans to use {} instead of ?, in analogy with
> the -exec argument of find(1).
>
> mv {} .{}.uu
>
> That could be a good idea.
Likewise, {} could be made available to 'shell-command' as well, to
make it easy to run arbitrary commands on the file associated with the
current buffer. For example C-x C-s M-! cp {} {}.save RET before
starting to make possibly hazardous changes...
-- Johan
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, (continued)
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Juri Linkov, 2004/10/12
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/12
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, David Kastrup, 2004/10/13
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/13
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?,
Johan Vromans <=
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Andreas Schwab, 2004/10/14
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Miles Bader, 2004/10/14
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Andreas Schwab, 2004/10/14
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/15
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Juri Linkov, 2004/10/15
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/16
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Reinhard Kotucha, 2004/10/14
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, Miles Bader, 2004/10/15
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, David Kastrup, 2004/10/15
- Re: ! in Dired--what was the outcome?, David Kastrup, 2004/10/14