Re: Patch: new function process-file (call-process with file handlers)

[Michael Albinus]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> INFILE is a standard argument to call-process.
> Perhaps the file name handler should be found on INFILE
> instead of on default-directory.

Both INFILE and default-directory could be remote on _different_
hosts. Why not to support this case?

That means: file name handler is chosen depending on
default-directory. Standard implementation and all other
implementations should be able to handle remote INFILE (local copy in
case of standard implementation).

Best regards, Michael.