[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 05:05:55 -0400 |
I know looked at the three remaining calls in simple.el myself. The
call in `kill-ring-save' _seems_ to me to be an example of correct
non-message use.
I agree, in this case. This code gives the user visual feedback,
which is what message does.
There are tons of uses in help.el, help-fns, faces.el, apropos.el,
which are all of exactly the same "help-xref" type. I did not check
these. However, I somehow get the impression that whoever wrote the
code knew what they were doing.
I think those are all erroneous.
The behavior controlled in this case is clearing a stack.
Whether to clear the stack should be the same regardless
of whether a keyboard macro is executing.
Can someone look at how to fix these?
That leaves:
I started checking these, and I found:
man.el: Man-cleanup-manpage
I think the reason for checking interactive-p here is just in case
someone wants to do M-x Man-cleanup-manpage. I am not sure that
feature is worth having, but in any case the code is not correct.
menubar.el: menu-bar-make-toggle
That was a bug. It was using interactive-p to control whether to call
customize-mark-as-set. The toggle command would have done the wrong
thing in a keyboard macro.
pcomplete.el: pcomplete
That is a bug too. The code does something substantive, not just
visual feedback for the user.
woman.el: woman
That is a bug too. The code it controls does find-file; it is not
just visual feedback.
So far, four errors out of four. I fixed these. Could other people
check the rest? The rule is simple: if it conditionalizes anything
more than visual feedback for the user, it is wrong to use
interactive-p. Therefore, you don't have to really master the code to
fix these problems.
Here is what is left on that list:
comint.el: comint-strip-ctrl-m
strokes.el: several. Of those, strokes-prompt-user-save-strokes is
another one that seems suspicious. I am completely
unfamiliar with strokes.el. But these seem to be mouse
related functions. I do not know whether calling these
from keyboard macros makes any sense to begin with.
newcomment.el: comment-indent-new-line
printing.el: several
dired-x.el: dired-omit-expunge, dired-x-bind-find-file
bookmark.el: bookmark-maybe-historicize-string, bookmark-bmenu-list
ffap.el: several.
completion.el: add-completion, add-permanent-completion
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, (continued)
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Ken Manheimer, 2004/10/28
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/23
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/23
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/24
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/25
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Kim F. Storm, 2004/10/26
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/23
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/24
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/24
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/24
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/24
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/26
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/24
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/23
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/23
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, John Paul Wallington, 2004/10/23
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/21
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/23
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/23
- Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use, Kim F. Storm, 2004/10/18