[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tex-mode binding of C-return
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Tex-mode binding of C-return |
Date: |
Tue, 03 May 2005 10:02:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> C-return is such a "good command", analogue to C-SPC for the
>> normal mark.
>
> I don't find C-return a particularly good choice (especially since it
> doesn't work on ttys).
Neither does S-return... Does C-space work on ttys?
>
> Is the idea that to kill a rectangle you could do
>
> C-RET C-SPC .... M-w
Just do:
C-RET ... M-w
>
> or equivalently
>
> C-SPC ... C-RET ... M-w
That works, yes, changing the normal mark to
a rectangle mark.
> But to tell you the truth, it's hard to judge
> without the whole context (i.e. what would be the interface for that
> new rectangle handling thingy?).
Try this:
- Open some text in a buffer
- M-x cua-mode RET
- Place the cursor on the top left corner of "a" rectangle.
- S-return
- move to cursor to bottom right corner of that rectangle,
using C-f, C-b, C-n, C-p or any other normal cursor movement.
- C-w
- Move somewhere else in the buffer
- C-y
I'm suggesting to use C-return instead of S-return to toggle the
rectangle mark, just like C-space toggles the normal mark.
>
>> Do tex users really use C-return ?
>
> At least I don't.
Good :-)
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
Re: Tex-mode binding of C-return, Daniel Brockman, 2005/05/02
Re: Tex-mode binding of C-return, Harald Maier, 2005/05/04