[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 20:46:22 +0200 |
On 8/4/05, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> But in my
> reply to Sascha I pointed out to him that his way of applying the term
> "a program" to Linux would fit GNU/Linux quite as well. Which did not
> really serve to render the view he claimed to support more plausible.
Oh, I think yes, it does make it more plausible. I call Emacs "a
program", irrespective of whether it includes other, subservient
programs (like movemail, emacsclient, etc.). I don't think the
definition of "program" is as monolithic as you make it sound.
--
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, (continued)
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, David Kastrup, 2005/08/03
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/08/03
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, David Kastrup, 2005/08/04
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Sascha Wilde, 2005/08/04
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, David Kastrup, 2005/08/04
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Sascha Wilde, 2005/08/04
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, David Kastrup, 2005/08/04
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/08/04
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/08/04
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, David Kastrup, 2005/08/04
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Markus Gritsch, 2005/08/04
Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2005/08/01