[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rcirc.el
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: rcirc.el |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 22:43:08 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> I think it's best if the packages keep their names when they get
>> integrated, unless the name poses a real problem
> I do think that users should be able to start an irc session with M-x
> irc. We can do that without renaming everything.
We can provide an `irc' alias without any problem, indeed. It doesn't have
much to do with renaming or not.
> I think it depends a lot on exactly what the name is, and the
> package's history.
Sure. Since IIUC there are other IRC clients for Emacs out there, it makes
sense to be careful. Maybe none of them already use the name `irc', but you
never know. Furthermore, even without a long history, it
introduces confusion.
> But for packages with no significant independent history, which
> perform a fairly generic function in "the obvious way", calling every
> function "joes-great-foo-mode-asdf" instead of just "foo-asdf" is
> simply noise.
We're talking "rcirc" vs "irc". We're not talking some insanely long names.
Stefan
- rcirc.el, Ryan Yeske, 2005/10/10
- Re: rcirc.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/16
- Re: rcirc.el, Nic Ferrier, 2005/10/16
- Re: rcirc.el, Ryan Yeske, 2005/10/18
- Re: rcirc.el, Romain Francoise, 2005/10/18
- Re: rcirc.el, David Kastrup, 2005/10/18
- Re: rcirc.el, Ryan Yeske, 2005/10/18
- Re: rcirc.el, David Kastrup, 2005/10/19
- Re: rcirc.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/19
- Re: rcirc.el, Andreas Schwab, 2005/10/19
- Re: rcirc.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/19