[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rcirc.el
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: rcirc.el |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:16:24 +0100 |
"Richard M. Stallman" <address@hidden> writes:
> Do you think the package should be renamed from "rcirc" to simply
> "irc"?
>
> I have no opinion about the package name, but I think the most
> important question is the name of the command used to invoke it. We
> should make that name as natural and easy to remember as we can.
I think rms is right and personally I have no problem with rcirc.
Nic
- Re: rcirc.el, (continued)
- Re: rcirc.el, Ryan Yeske, 2005/10/14
- Re: rcirc.el, Stefan Monnier, 2005/10/14
- Re: rcirc.el, Ryan Yeske, 2005/10/14
- Re: rcirc.el, Miles Bader, 2005/10/14
- Re: rcirc.el, Stefan Monnier, 2005/10/14
- Re: rcirc.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/16
- Re: rcirc.el,
Nic Ferrier <=
- Re: rcirc.el, Ryan Yeske, 2005/10/18
- Re: rcirc.el, Romain Francoise, 2005/10/18
- Re: rcirc.el, David Kastrup, 2005/10/18
- Re: rcirc.el, Ryan Yeske, 2005/10/18
- Re: rcirc.el, David Kastrup, 2005/10/19
- Re: rcirc.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/19
- Re: rcirc.el, Andreas Schwab, 2005/10/19
- Re: rcirc.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/19
- Re: rcirc.el, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/18
- Re: rcirc.el, Ryan Yeske, 2005/10/19