[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flyspell bug
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: flyspell bug |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:42:46 -0400 |
#> But sometimes it seems to behave strangely, like taking 10 seconds to
#> go from 0% to 10%, then immediately jumping to 40%, and then
#> immediately reporting "Spell Checking completed." And in such cases
#> the buffer is not checked correctly.
open etc/refcard.tex, M-x flyspell-buffer, go to the end of the buffer
and notice that, for example, defun (21 lines from the bottom of the
buffer) isn't marked as misspelled.
I do see that--but I am not sure it is a bug. When I type M-$ on
`defun', it says that word is correct. And there was no jumping in
the percentages in the progress reports.
Can anyone else see if there is a real bug here?
- Re: flyspell bug, (continued)
- Re: flyspell bug, David Kastrup, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/10
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/12
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/13
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/13
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/14
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/14
- Re: flyspell bug,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/23
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/23
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Agustin Martin, 2005/10/25
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/25
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/24