[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flyspell bug
From: |
Slawomir Nowaczyk |
Subject: |
Re: flyspell bug |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:59:56 +0200 |
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 01:11:05 -0400
"Richard M. Stallman" <address@hidden> wrote:
#> But sometimes it seems to behave strangely, like taking 10 seconds to
#> go from 0% to 10%, then immediately jumping to 40%, and then
#> immediately reporting "Spell Checking completed." And in such cases
#> the buffer is not checked correctly.
#>
#> I agree. If you send us a test case that fails, we can debug it.
That's what I did earlier... Sorry if I was unclear. Can you reproduce
the bug on your machine? The stuff below exposes the bug for me, after
"runemacs --no-init-file --no-site-file"
open etc/refcard.tex, M-x flyspell-buffer, go to the end of the buffer
and notice that, for example, defun (21 lines from the bottom of the
buffer) isn't marked as misspelled.
--
Best wishes,
Slawomir Nowaczyk
( address@hidden )
Live in the past and future only.
- Re: flyspell bug, (continued)
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/10
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/12
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/13
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/13
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/14
- Re: flyspell bug,
Slawomir Nowaczyk <=
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/23
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/23
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/23
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/24
- Re: flyspell bug, Agustin Martin, 2005/10/25
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/25
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/24