[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flyspell bug
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: flyspell bug |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Oct 2005 23:32:52 -0400 |
> I think it would be extremely confusing if switching windows to look
> around in another buffer were likely to run some Lisp code.
How would you notice if flyspell did some "behind the scenes"
dictionary setup ?
It might cause a lot of trouble if it had a bug of some kind, or if it
did things with processes at a time you did not expect.
Anyway, my intuition, based on many years of programming, says
that it is a bad idea for switching buffers to run a hook.
- flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/02
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/02
- Re: flyspell bug, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/02
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/02
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/04
- Re: flyspell bug,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: flyspell bug, David Kastrup, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/10
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/12
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/13
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/13
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/14
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/14