[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flyspell bug
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: flyspell bug |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Oct 2005 11:34:45 -0400 |
I often wondered why there are no hooks associated with switching
buffers, windows, and frames.
These activities are too low level. Certainly in the past it was not
safe to run Lisp code for switching buffers, and maybe not for windows
either. Nowadays, since Lisp code can run during redisplay, maybe
it would be safe. But I do not like the idea. Do you really want
set-buffer to run Lisp code you don't know about?
- flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/02
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/02
- Re: flyspell bug, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/02
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/02
- Re: flyspell bug,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: flyspell bug, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/04
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/04
- Re: flyspell bug, David Kastrup, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/10
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/12