[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flyspell bug
From: |
Slawomir Nowaczyk |
Subject: |
Re: flyspell bug |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Oct 2005 01:28:34 +0200 |
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 23:45:26 +0200
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) wrote:
#> > It seems, therefore, that flyspell should read buffer local
#> > specifications at least after changing buffers.
#> I guess you mean after switching buffers (in the emacs terminology)?
Yes... sorry for being unclear.
#> I often wondered why there are no hooks associated with switching
#> buffers, windows, and frames.
Having those would be a great idea, IMHO.
I like to my cursor change colour to red when in overwrite mode, and
currently my solution uses post-command-hook. Having a hook run after
buffer switch would simplify things :)
#> > #> Which suggests making this change. Does it fix the problem?
#> >
#> > Your change does seem to fix the problem with transient mark mode for
#> > me, though.
#>
#> Which is one good reason to install it unless somebody can make
#> a better fix soon!!
Yes, definitely. I have applied the fix to my personal copy of Emacs
already :)
--
Best wishes,
Slawomir Nowaczyk
( address@hidden )
Be nice to other people--they outnumber you six billion to one.
- flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/02
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/02
- Re: flyspell bug, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/02
- Re: flyspell bug,
Slawomir Nowaczyk <=
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/04
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/04
- Re: flyspell bug, David Kastrup, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/10