[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64 |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:09:06 -0400 |
> Yes, and they both are almost certainly needed. The reason is that
> some functions in libgcc.a call functions from libc.a, and some libc.a
> functions need functions from libgcc.a. Since most versions of ld are
> one-pass linkers, you need to mention -lgcc twice, or else risk
> getting unresolved externals.
Someone should add a comment above that line
to explain this.
- RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/10/26
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/26
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Frank Schmitt, 2005/10/27
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/10/27
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/10/27
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/10/27
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Frank Schmitt, 2005/10/28
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/10/28
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/29
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/10/29
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/29
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/10/29
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/10/29
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/29
Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Dryice Liu, 2005/10/27