[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64
From: |
Giorgos Keramidas |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64 |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:01:11 +0300 |
On 2005-10-28 14:09, "Richard M. Stallman" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Yes, and they both are almost certainly needed. The reason is that
> > some functions in libgcc.a call functions from libc.a, and some libc.a
> > functions need functions from libgcc.a. Since most versions of ld are
> > one-pass linkers, you need to mention -lgcc twice, or else risk
> > getting unresolved externals.
>
> Someone should add a comment above that line
> to explain this.
Something like this perhaps?
http://people.freebsd.org/~keramida/emacs/22/freebsd-amd64+libgcc.patch
I took the liberty of adding a comment to the __FreeBSD__ #ifdef for the
location of the 64-bit libraries.
- RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/10/26
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/26
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Frank Schmitt, 2005/10/27
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/10/27
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/10/27
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/10/27
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Frank Schmitt, 2005/10/28
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/28
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64,
Giorgos Keramidas <=
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/29
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/10/29
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/29
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/10/29
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/10/29
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/29
Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Dryice Liu, 2005/10/27