[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: coding tags and utf-16
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: coding tags and utf-16 |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Jan 2006 13:33:43 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, "Richard M. Stallman" <address@hidden> writes:
> If a file is encoded without BOM, we must use the less
> reliable heuristics to guess utf-16be or utf-16le. If you
> find a coding-tag spec by ignoring all zero bytes at even
> byte indexes, it means that the file is, in high
> possibility, utf-16be whatever the tag value is. If you
> find a coding-tag spec by ignoring all zero bytes at odd
> byte indexes, it means that the file is utf-16le whatever
> the tag value is.
> Does Emacs already implement these heuristics?
No.
> But, those are anyway just heuristics; not 100% reliable.
> So I think we need a user option to turn it on and off, or
> perhaps a user option to select which kind of heuristics.
> Should we install this option now?
I can't tell whether or not it's important enough to install
now because I never encountered a utf-16 file.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/04
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/01/04
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/01/04
- Re: coding tags and utf-16,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/01/05
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/01/05
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/06
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/01/06
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/07
Re: coding tags and utf-16, Stefan Monnier, 2006/01/05