[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: coding tags and utf-16
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: coding tags and utf-16 |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Jan 2006 13:24:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
> "Richard M. Stallman" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Should we install this option now?
>
> I can't tell whether or not it's important enough to install
> now because I never encountered a utf-16 file.
I think the most common occurence would be system files on MS Windows.
The byte markers are very unique: I think we should heed them unless
there are very important technical considerations speaking against it
(one reason would be if the utf-16 encodings were not
content-preserving for saving binary files. No idea whether this is
the case).
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/04
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/01/04
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/01/04
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/04
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/01/05
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/01/05
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/06
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/01/06
- Re: coding tags and utf-16, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/07
Re: coding tags and utf-16, Stefan Monnier, 2006/01/05