Re: Emacs antialiasing in X

[Jan Djärv]

Emfox Zhou wrote:
> David Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:

> > in emacs-unicode-2, do I want to keep the latter, since the
> > character representation is changing?
> >
> > Also, would it be better to come up with a patch against
> > emacs-unicode-2 that adds XFT support, or vice-versa?  I am inclined
> > towards the former.
>
>
> I think emacs-unicode-2 is more recent, and a patch against emacs-unicode-2
> to add XFT support is better. as a notice, I have tested both of the branches,
> and find the XFT branch could not deal properly with chinese, while the unicode
> one seems ok for everything.

I agree, you would start with emacs-unicode-2 and then add XFT to that, i.e. 
the former as you state above.  W.r.t. characters, this implies that you shall 
keep whatever is in the emacs-unicode-2 branch.

        Jan D.