Re: Emacs antialiasing in X

[David Abrahams]

Jan Djärv <address@hidden> writes:

> Emfox Zhou wrote:
>> David Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>>in emacs-unicode-2, do I want to keep the latter, since the
>>>character representation is changing?
>>>
>>>Also, would it be better to come up with a patch against
>>>emacs-unicode-2 that adds XFT support, or vice-versa?  I am inclined
>>>towards the former.
>>>
>> I think emacs-unicode-2 is more recent, and a patch against
>> emacs-unicode-2
>> to add XFT support is better. as a notice, I have tested both of the 
>> branches,
>> and find the XFT branch could not deal properly with chinese, while the 
>> unicode
>> one seems ok for everything.
>
> I agree, you would start with emacs-unicode-2 and then add XFT to that, i.e. 
> the former as you state above.  W.r.t. characters, this implies that you 
> shall 
> keep whatever is in the emacs-unicode-2 branch.

OK, great.  What about Changelog, NEWS, etc.?  I seriously doubt my
ability to reason about what should be kept from each branch.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com