[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs antialiasing in X
From: |
David Abrahams |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs antialiasing in X |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 08:38:49 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Jan D." <address@hidden> writes:
>> Are you telling me that edits made to ChangeLog, NEWS, etc., in the
>> XFT branch are expendable?
>
> Yes, because those files have not been changed.
I don't mean to be difficult, but I think "CVS merge" disagrees with
you. If they had not been changed at all, wouldn't it leave them
untouched when I merge the XFT branch into the unicode-2 branch?
> Kenichi Handa:s suggestion about separate files is a good one.
Thanks.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, (continued)
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Lőrentey Károly, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Jan D., 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Miles Bader, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X,
David Abrahams <=
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Jan D., 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Jan D., 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Miles Bader, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Jan D., 2006/01/17
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/17
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Miles Bader, 2006/01/17
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/19
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/28