[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs antialiasing in X
From: |
Jan D. |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs antialiasing in X |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:53:35 +0100 (CET) |
> "Jan D." <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> Are you telling me that edits made to ChangeLog, NEWS, etc., in the
> >> XFT branch are expendable?
> >
> > Yes, because those files have not been changed.
>
> I don't mean to be difficult, but I think "CVS merge" disagrees with
> you. If they had not been changed at all, wouldn't it leave them
> untouched when I merge the XFT branch into the unicode-2 branch?
One would think so. However, when I merge stuff from HEAD to the XFT
branch, I get conflicts in files I know I have not modified. Probably some
merge expert can explain why that happens.
Jan D.
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, (continued)
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Lőrentey Károly, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Jan D., 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Miles Bader, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X,
Jan D. <=
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Jan D., 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Miles Bader, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Jan D., 2006/01/17
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/17
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Miles Bader, 2006/01/17
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/19
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/28
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/17