Re: Tiny change to find-tag-default.

[Kim F. Storm]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     Wouldn't it make sense to rewrite the rest of `find-tag-default' too?
>     In its current version it unnecessarily clobbers `match-data', requires
>     a `condition-case' to handle errors in `forward-sexp', and has other
>     tedious things like repeated forward-charing and re-searching.
>
> That isn't a core part of the system, so I see no need to reject this.

I don't see any real benefit from "fixing" find-tag-default at this stage
(since it isn't broken).

IMO, we should leave it alone for now, and "fix" it after the release.

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk